I appreciate your insight, but it seems like we're still just having a differing opinion based upon what WS means in this context.
Just because the games aren't all built the same does not mean that a coach or, if you'd like, the players are unaccountable for winning more games before rather than after drafting a #1 pick. You're basically arguing that because different schedules are different, Pop and/or the team can't be expected to win the same amount or basketball gods forbid, more games. I find that absurd, honestly - which is why I believe your position to be meritless. It's as absurd as saying Pop has been tanking for a long time when the players and Pop himself are saying otherwise, in my opinion. There's every reason to believe the Spurs with a healthy Devin Vassell and a generational talent are better than the team which doesn't have either. That statement is based upon common sense, not necessarily any advanced stat. I looked up the last pick before Wemby just to see if this bears out at all, and Paolo Banchero improved his team by 12 wins in the following season. It's just obfuscation trying to argue the point if you're going to purposely be obtuse and say well, the schedule's aren't mirrored so that should discount any expectations. I'm assuming your position, as you've been less than forthright about it. Am I incorrect in believing you don't hold Pop or any coach to a higher standard when they add (now) proven talent to a team?