Page 41 of 91 FirstFirst ... 3137383940414243444551 ... LastLast
Results 1,001 to 1,025 of 2258
  1. #1001
    Veteran kace's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,638
    well, i'm not very good with all these CBA things, but i surely don't get how Reaves was paid only 14M/year. If someone would take the time to explain it to me.

    I get that players in LA will have more hype. But from what i saw, i don'tget Reaves only getting that, he seemed like the real deal fot the role he's asked to have.

    , Keldon at 18.5/year was considered a good deal, and it was. but Reaves is the better passer, the better shooter, the better defender. and i think that given the same role, he could easily score as much as Keldon.

    There are two question about Reaves. Was this last year a fluke , but he seems more like a late bloomer than anything else.
    And could he be as efficient as the primary option, but he probably won't have to be, and even 25M/year, the max he could get, wasn't "first option" money in today NBA.

    I really don't get how any other team didn't offer more.

  2. #1002
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,378
    I just don’t want to be in a spot where we don’t take the opportunity to add players when we have the means to do so. Once we have to start handing our guys big extensions (Vassell looming), that flexibility fades

    who knows what Zollins would cost next year as a UFA?
    They shouldn’t add players just because they can. They should have a plan to field a contender by 2025-26 when Victor is mature enough to dominate, and all moves should be in harmony with that goal.

    The first order of business is to build the core around Wemby — his Manu and Tony. Nobody readily available this offseason fits those roles. No, not Dame.

    The goal is not to field the most compe ive team possible for 2023-24. I understand that Spurs fans are tired of losing and don’t want another throwaway season, so they’re willing to mortgage part of a spectacular dynastic future to get some short-term baubles. Actually no, I don’t understand it. It’s ing asinine.

  3. #1003
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    40,383
    timvpYou were one of the people who mentioned yesterday that the Spurs had plenty of time to offer Reeves a contract and could wait several days. Yet less than 24 hours later, here we are.

    For those who actually wanted the Spurs to make an offer, sooner would have been better, yes? Or can the Spurs still call his agent and try to get him to pull a Marcus Morris?

  4. #1004
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    12,290
    Dame to Houston? Tiny Backcourt v2.0?

  5. #1005
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    40,383
    They shouldn’t add players just because they can. They should have a plan to field a contender by 2025-26 when Victor is mature enough to dominate, and all moves should be in harmony with that goal.

    The first order of business is to build the core around Wemby — his Manu and Tony. Nobody readily available this offseason fits those roles. No, not Dame.

    The goal is not to field the most compe ive team possible for 2023-24. I understand that Spurs fans are tired of losing and don’t want another throwaway season, so they’re willing to mortgage part of a spectacular dynastic future to get some short-term baubles. Actually no, I don’t understand it. It’s ing asinine.
    In the simulation on YouTube, the Spurs didn't win their first le until Victor was 29. They won four in a row.

  6. #1006
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    76,243
    Not denying they did a good job putting some pieces around them. Just saying let's pump the brakes on anointing them best in the West; they're still likely to be a play-in team.

    Denver

    Phoenix

    Dubs
    Kings
    Clippers (could be higher)
    Lakers
    Grizz

    Pels
    T'Pups
    Mavs
    The rest
    Ya - I don’t think they are best in west. But they are improved and in the mix and that’s all that matters.

  7. #1007
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    12,290
    timvpYou were one of the people who mentioned yesterday that the Spurs had plenty of time to offer Reeves a contract and could wait several days. Yet less than 24 hours later, here we are.

    For those who actually wanted the Spurs to make an offer, sooner would have been better, yes? Or can the Spurs still call his agent and try to get him to pull a Marcus Morris?
    Waiting made sense - but would have required a verbal agreement with his agent with us basically promising that we'd make the offer on the last day of the moratorium period. At that point, Reaves' agent would have been ecstatic because he'd have just made his client (and himself) a bunch more money with the major risk being the Spurs (or any similar team) not living up to their promise.

    But, it appears no such conversations were had and Reaves wanted to stay in LA so they went with what they had. It does very much surprise me that they didn't do something else, even just playing under the QO to be a UFA next year and make more money. But as it is, Reaves will make slightly more than Gabe Vincent, less than Max Strus and less that Bruce Brown

    Don't think any Marcus Morris shenanigans will be played, and definitely don't think the Spurs would be the ones to play such games.

  8. #1008
    Forum Official Personal Life Coach BacktoBasics's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    11,033
    well, i'm not very good with all these CBA things, but i surely don't get how Reaves was paid only 14M/year. If someone would take the time to explain it to me.

    I get that players in LA will have more hype. But from what i saw, i don'tget Reaves only getting that, he seemed like the real deal fot the role he's asked to have.

    , Keldon at 18.5/year was considered a good deal, and it was. but Reaves is the better passer, the better shooter, the better defender. and i think that given the same role, he could easily score as much as Keldon.

    There are two question about Reaves. Was this last year a fluke , but he seems more like a late bloomer than anything else.
    And could he be as efficient as the primary option, but he probably won't have to be, and even 25M/year, the max he could get, wasn't "first option" money in today NBA.

    I really don't get how any other team didn't offer more.
    You’re basing Reaves being better on too small of a sample size. He got fair market value. If he plays identically to how he played last season even the 56 million will be an overpay.

  9. #1009
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,759
    timvpYou were one of the people who mentioned yesterday that the Spurs had plenty of time to offer Reeves a contract and could wait several days. Yet less than 24 hours later, here we are.

    For those who actually wanted the Spurs to make an offer, sooner would have been better, yes? Or can the Spurs still call his agent and try to get him to pull a Marcus Morris?
    The Spurs were the last team able to give Reaves his max. Apparently Reaves' agents heard from the Spurs that there would be no offer coming so they decided to just take the best deal they could get from the Lakers. If the Spurs indicated an offer could have been coming, Reaves would have waited.

  10. #1010
    Costly Mistakes JPB's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    4,863
    Look, again, there’s a difference in throwing baby out with bath water (saying SA sucks or is in an awful spot) and discussing some very real missed opportunities and nuance. Spurs have not had a good free agency period. Now, does that mean they were awful? No. They did fine with Tre and Cham but that was literally the bare minimum lol.

    There was so much more opportunity to get creative and maybe they still do. But I dont like the Cedi trade as it represents just money and no basketball help at all and that’s not what I want to see with a team that has SO MUCH cap space and picks etc….there’s more that could have and should have (and maybe will) been done here.

    Nuance. Context.
    Not contesting in a vacuum, but what could have been reasonably done by the spurs (assuming it would have been on the table)? Saying this because I never imagine I'm smarter than spurs FO in the grand scheme of things, and not because they don't make (for the moment) any move that it would be a bad FA. It's clear spurs won't make any move that isn't a no brainer with Wemby in...

  11. #1011
    Believe. Cardinal's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Post Count
    241
    What can the spurs get out of a Portland-Miami deal that would make them want to help facilitate as a 3rd party?

  12. #1012
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    38,220
    Adrian Wojnarowski @wojespn
    27s
    The Jazz are trading center Damian Jones to the Cavaliers, sources tell ESPN.

  13. #1013
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    12,290
    Not denying they did a good job putting some pieces around them. Just saying let's pump the brakes on anointing them best in the West; they're still likely to be a play-in team.

    Denver

    Phoenix

    Dubs
    Kings
    Clippers (could be higher)
    Lakers
    Grizz

    Pels
    T'Pups
    Mavs
    The rest
    Clippers and Kings are interesting to me on this list. Clippers could be higher, or could be a lottery team if Neph and PG have another injury filled season (which is not all that unlikely). That team really has zero depth... we'll see if they land Dame or Harden.

    Kings could very well slip back into a 15 year playoff drought as well.

  14. #1014
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    38,220
    Chris Haynes
    ChrisBHaynes
    now
    Free agent forward Jae Crowder has reached an agreement to re-sign with the Milwaukee Bucks on a one-year deal, league sources tell @NBAonTNT, @BleacherReport.

  15. #1015
    Forum Official Personal Life Coach BacktoBasics's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    11,033
    Not contesting in a vacuum, but what could have been reasonably done by the spurs (assuming it would have been on the table)? Saying this because i never imagine I'm smarter than spurs FO in the grand scheme of things.
    These people wanted Reaves for a 100 million. I don’t buy the LA thing at this point. I bet anything over 70 million and LA makes that team eat it.

    Thank god we didn’t offer him 80 million or something.

  16. #1016
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    5,461
    What can the spurs get out of a Portland-Miami deal that would make them want to help facilitate as a 3rd party?
    It's hard to say because it doesn't seem like they want to go much over the floor and they don't want players... of course, that's just an impression and it could be totally wrong...if they wanted Lowry or Herro, I'm sure they could get one... it just doesn't appear they want to do anything else this summer..

  17. #1017
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    18,672
    I'm trying to figure out what the max Champagnie's contract could be next season. IIRC, there's a stipulation that an option year at the end of a contract can't be for less money than the previous year. But I think the Spurs may be able to get around that by making the last season unguaranteed rather than an option. I believe it also depends how exactly the Spurs sign him that determines whether the Spurs can decline his contract by 8% or 5%.
    Champagnie is a non-bird player, I don't think he is eligible to the 8% raise/decrease.

    If the last year is a team option:
    $3,200,000
    $3,040,000
    $2,880,000
    $2,880,000

    If the last year is non-guaranteed:
    $3,243,243
    $3,081,081
    $2,918,919
    $2,756,757

  18. #1018
    Veteran Degoat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    3,764
    Are we ever going to get a center?

  19. #1019
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,759
    well, i'm not very good with all these CBA things, but i surely don't get how Reaves was paid only 14M/year. If someone would take the time to explain it to me.

    I get that players in LA will have more hype. But from what i saw, i don'tget Reaves only getting that, he seemed like the real deal fot the role he's asked to have.

    , Keldon at 18.5/year was considered a good deal, and it was. but Reaves is the better passer, the better shooter, the better defender. and i think that given the same role, he could easily score as much as Keldon.

    There are two question about Reaves. Was this last year a fluke , but he seems more like a late bloomer than anything else.
    And could he be as efficient as the primary option, but he probably won't have to be, and even 25M/year, the max he could get, wasn't "first option" money in today NBA.

    I really don't get how any other team didn't offer more.
    Reaves was restricted and the Lakers couldn't give him any more than they did. If a team gave Reaves an offer, the Lakers could have waited until the 7th to match the offer and keep him. Apparently no team wanted their cap space to be in limbo for a week and most likely end up not getting Reaves at the end of that week.

  20. #1020
    Veteran offset formation's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,561
    Adrian Wojnarowski @wojespn
    27s
    The Jazz are trading center Damian Jones to the Cavaliers, sources tell ESPN.
    I hear SA native Jordan Clarkson could be moved by Jazz. Thoughts?

  21. #1021
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,378
    Are we ever going to get a center?
    They still have to spend at least $5 million more to reach the salary floor, so maybe.

  22. #1022
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    76,243
    Not contesting in a vacuum, but what could have been reasonably done by the spurs (assuming it would have been on the table)? Saying this because I never imagine I'm smarter than spurs FO in the grand scheme of things, and not because they don't make (for the moment) any move that it would be a bad FA. It's clear spurs won't make any move that isn't a no brainer with Wemby in...
    I think high level - we could have seen Sa in on some of these opportunities OKC/DET got in on for their cap space that yielded better ROI than Cedi deal for example. Outside of that, IF the Cedi deal was truly to reach floor, easily could have just signed McDaniels or Grant or someone that is actually a remotely interesting player to accomplish the same goal while getting something more valuable than another 2nd; a legit player with a spark of upside

    Beyond that, there were opportunities like Reaves or trades like Obi Toppin (again, I think SA can’t worry about fit too much, just look for value and talent at this point especially when cost is cap space and 2 2nds or less which we have a million of).

    All small things and maybe they do sign McDaniels for example to a decent 1 year deal and it shows Cedi deal was smart business to a degree vs just money…its fluid. But they have definitely been less opportunistic this off season after landing Wemby than other teams in similar scenarios (INDY, DET, OKC)

  23. #1023
    Spurs Sage Russ's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    9,128
    timvpYou were one of the people who mentioned yesterday that the Spurs had plenty of time to offer Reeves a contract and could wait several days. Yet less than 24 hours later, here we are.

    For those who actually wanted the Spurs to make an offer, sooner would have been better, yes? Or can the Spurs still call his agent and try to get him to pull a Marcus Morris?
    One thing people sometimes forget is that the player has to accept (sign) an offer sheet.

    If Reaves had no intention of signing an offer sheet with the Spurs (or perhaps anyone else), nothing else matters -- the effort never goes anywhere.

    Also, if a player signs an offer sheet, he has to be prepared to play in that town for a fair amount of time. Maybe Reaves didn't want to take that chance.

    Simply put, Reaves is a big fan favorite in LA and may just want to stay there.

  24. #1024
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    12,290
    Gorgui Dieng patiently waiting by his phone, prepared to get paaaaaaaaaaaaaaaid

  25. #1025
    Veteran offset formation's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    5,561
    Are we ever going to get a center?
    Did we even try to offer Book Lopez

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •