Kori Ellis
10-23-2004, 12:13 AM
This is the result of the latest Battle Blog. Doyen (toosmallshoes) won the Blog.
Barry: Money Well Spent?
http://www.woai.com/spurs/story.aspx?content_id=25378E9D-F21F-49ED-B648-DE93AE580A57
http://cctvimedia.clearchannel.com/woai/bbarry4.jpg
We continue the SpursZONE.com series of Point/Counterpoint articles in which two people debate different aspects of Spurs basketball and the rest of the NBA.
In this edition, Spurs fan Marcel Jones and FullSportPress.com writer Robert Doyen discuss the acquisition of Brent Barry.
Jones: The San Antonio Spurs went into the summer with beaucoup cash and a plan. Gregg Popovich and R.C. Buford knew what they wanted to do. And as summer changed to autumn, the plan was a success.
Good news, right? I don’t think so.
I stick to the theory that the Spurs should have used the summer to get younger, more athletic and more unafraid of big situations. Instead they got older, smaller, and less athletic, while the questions regarding the clutchness of the shooters is still a reoccurring theme.
Re-signing Manu Ginobili was a good first step, but I believe that the correct second step was going after Stephen Jackson. We all saw what Jackson could do under pressure when the Spurs won the championship in 2003 and we all noticed how last year he played well despite any quality players around him. This was the guy the Spurs needed. It was a mistake that they let him go the first time and an even bigger mistake they didn’t sign him back this past summer.
The Spurs decided to spend they money that could have bought Jackson on Brent Barry and Bruce Bowen. I recognize both are quality players but they are one trick ponies. One can’t score, the other can’t defend. When the playoffs roll around, we still don’t know what to expect with those two on the outside.
Jackson is an all-around talent with a knack for hitting big shots. That is what the Spurs desperately need.
Doyen: The reason Stephen Jackson is fearless is because he's thoughtless. And for as many times as he hit a big three-pointer, he also foolishly turned the ball over. Jackson is not an all-around talent. He can hardly even dribble. He's a good defender and sometimes he gets hot as a shooter. Otherwise he's a turnover prone streak shooter who the Spurs died by as often as they lived by.
Just because Jamal Crawford lit up Brent Barry in his first preseason game with the Spurs doesn't mean he won't improve as a defender in the Spurs system. Not to mention he is a clutch shooter who has burned many teams, including the Spurs, with late game heroics.
We all saw that what the Spurs missed last year in the playoffs was a consistent shooter to take the pressure off of Duncan. Barry is a much more consistent shooter than Jackson ever has been and is one of the most consistent shooters in the league right now. And he can dribble and pass much better than SJax.
As far as youth, the main place the Spurs got older this year is at the reserve center/power forward position that elder statesmen Kevin Willis and Robert Horry played last year. Otherwise they bring back Devin Brown, Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili. And they're bringing in a youngster at the point in Beno Udrih.
Barry is more dependable and a better shooter and therefore a better fit for the Spurs.
Jones: Barry is a dependable shooter in the regular season. We all know this. As far as the playoffs, that is a huge question mark floating above Barry’s head. Although he’s 32-years-old and has been around for about a decade, his postseason history is indistinguishable at best. The few times he’s made it that far, he hasn’t done much.
This Spurs team will win their 60 regular season games regardless. Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili and Tony Parker are that good. The key is the postseason and for all Jackson’s faults, he has a history of hitting big shots. And that history is something Barry doesn’t possess, even though you insist.
So far in the preseason, Barry has struggled to hit wide-open shots. If he is getting nervous as he acclimates to the Spurs now in October, what is going to happen when May appears on the calendar? That’s another scary question.
Doyen: I was at a game two years ago in which Barry hit a three-pointer with four seconds left that clinched a 20-point comeback victory for Seattle over the Spurs. That's pretty darn clutch. And I think his statistics speak much louder than anything I could say about his shooting ability. He possesses a 41% career three-point percentage, and in the playoffs that goes up to 43%. He also makes over 80% of his free-throws.
Compare that to Stephen Jackson's 33% career and 34% playoff three-point percentages.
Also, in ten years in the league he's only played in 13 playoff games for some pretty average Seattle teams. He's never had a chance to shine.
If his past is any indication, he will finally get his chance this May to create some positive playoff memories for himself. And he will do it for a lot less money.
Barry: Money Well Spent?
http://www.woai.com/spurs/story.aspx?content_id=25378E9D-F21F-49ED-B648-DE93AE580A57
http://cctvimedia.clearchannel.com/woai/bbarry4.jpg
We continue the SpursZONE.com series of Point/Counterpoint articles in which two people debate different aspects of Spurs basketball and the rest of the NBA.
In this edition, Spurs fan Marcel Jones and FullSportPress.com writer Robert Doyen discuss the acquisition of Brent Barry.
Jones: The San Antonio Spurs went into the summer with beaucoup cash and a plan. Gregg Popovich and R.C. Buford knew what they wanted to do. And as summer changed to autumn, the plan was a success.
Good news, right? I don’t think so.
I stick to the theory that the Spurs should have used the summer to get younger, more athletic and more unafraid of big situations. Instead they got older, smaller, and less athletic, while the questions regarding the clutchness of the shooters is still a reoccurring theme.
Re-signing Manu Ginobili was a good first step, but I believe that the correct second step was going after Stephen Jackson. We all saw what Jackson could do under pressure when the Spurs won the championship in 2003 and we all noticed how last year he played well despite any quality players around him. This was the guy the Spurs needed. It was a mistake that they let him go the first time and an even bigger mistake they didn’t sign him back this past summer.
The Spurs decided to spend they money that could have bought Jackson on Brent Barry and Bruce Bowen. I recognize both are quality players but they are one trick ponies. One can’t score, the other can’t defend. When the playoffs roll around, we still don’t know what to expect with those two on the outside.
Jackson is an all-around talent with a knack for hitting big shots. That is what the Spurs desperately need.
Doyen: The reason Stephen Jackson is fearless is because he's thoughtless. And for as many times as he hit a big three-pointer, he also foolishly turned the ball over. Jackson is not an all-around talent. He can hardly even dribble. He's a good defender and sometimes he gets hot as a shooter. Otherwise he's a turnover prone streak shooter who the Spurs died by as often as they lived by.
Just because Jamal Crawford lit up Brent Barry in his first preseason game with the Spurs doesn't mean he won't improve as a defender in the Spurs system. Not to mention he is a clutch shooter who has burned many teams, including the Spurs, with late game heroics.
We all saw that what the Spurs missed last year in the playoffs was a consistent shooter to take the pressure off of Duncan. Barry is a much more consistent shooter than Jackson ever has been and is one of the most consistent shooters in the league right now. And he can dribble and pass much better than SJax.
As far as youth, the main place the Spurs got older this year is at the reserve center/power forward position that elder statesmen Kevin Willis and Robert Horry played last year. Otherwise they bring back Devin Brown, Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili. And they're bringing in a youngster at the point in Beno Udrih.
Barry is more dependable and a better shooter and therefore a better fit for the Spurs.
Jones: Barry is a dependable shooter in the regular season. We all know this. As far as the playoffs, that is a huge question mark floating above Barry’s head. Although he’s 32-years-old and has been around for about a decade, his postseason history is indistinguishable at best. The few times he’s made it that far, he hasn’t done much.
This Spurs team will win their 60 regular season games regardless. Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili and Tony Parker are that good. The key is the postseason and for all Jackson’s faults, he has a history of hitting big shots. And that history is something Barry doesn’t possess, even though you insist.
So far in the preseason, Barry has struggled to hit wide-open shots. If he is getting nervous as he acclimates to the Spurs now in October, what is going to happen when May appears on the calendar? That’s another scary question.
Doyen: I was at a game two years ago in which Barry hit a three-pointer with four seconds left that clinched a 20-point comeback victory for Seattle over the Spurs. That's pretty darn clutch. And I think his statistics speak much louder than anything I could say about his shooting ability. He possesses a 41% career three-point percentage, and in the playoffs that goes up to 43%. He also makes over 80% of his free-throws.
Compare that to Stephen Jackson's 33% career and 34% playoff three-point percentages.
Also, in ten years in the league he's only played in 13 playoff games for some pretty average Seattle teams. He's never had a chance to shine.
If his past is any indication, he will finally get his chance this May to create some positive playoff memories for himself. And he will do it for a lot less money.