Reply With Quote
thats what ive been looking forThere are names for all the hijackers
do you have a link?
its not on the fbi site
And please, if you have anything more definitive than McDermott's work - let me know what it is.
thats what ive been looking forThere are names for all the hijackers
do you have a link?
its not on the fbi site
Yeah, none of those names were common names. Who'da thunk there's more than one guy named Mohammed living in the entire Middle East?
It's only been there for six years, and took me all of three search terms and two mouse clicks in google.
http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/092701hjpic.htm
And that's just a couple of weeks after the attacks.
Maybe you'll click the link in six months.
thats not what ive been looking forIt should be noted that attempts to confirm the true iden ies of these individuals are still under way.
its been six years
and we've talked about this for so long and you just now searched three items and clicked twice?
Truthfully, I have no idea what you are talking about and your claim that no one has ever been identified.
There were names and dates. That is what you asked for. To my knowledge, all the names of the hijackers are known as well as all but maybe four of their birth dates. The only things I have seen that disputes these identifications are:
1) Arab apologist propaganda
2) Poorly written UK stories based on above propaganda
3) Loose Change and its ilk that were based on the above two
None has presented anything resembling an alternative explanation or theory about what happened on 9/11.
1. the press release was weeks after sep 11th and 6 years later they still cant be indentified
that doesnt meanNone has presented anything resembling an alternative explanation or theory about what happened on 9/11
but theyve got atta and jahar, i might give you that
What does that mean? All of them were identified.1. the press release was weeks after sep 11th and 6 years later they still cant be indentified
It means everything. Given all the facts that are known, no one has even come up with any theory that fits the known facts. It leads me to believe that conspiracy nontheorist are either lazy or simply not interested in actually developing any theory at all.that doesnt mean
one of the first lines on the 6 year old fbi page wasIt should be noted that attempts to confirm the true iden ies of these individuals are still under way.
what known facts are you talking about??the building damage, fire, melting steel and collapse that was left out of the 9/11 commission reportfits the known facts
And in your research, what evidence have you found that these are not the hijackers?
Exactly, all that.what known facts are you talking about??the building damage, fire, melting steel and collapse that was left out of the 9/11 commission report
Not one theory.
because ive never read anything that gives the names or dates of births of the hijackerswhat evidence have you found that these are not the hijackers?
what known facts are you talking about??
the building damage, fire, melting steel and collapse that was left out of the 9/11 commission report
your best link has been a 6 year old press release that says they are still trying to find the true inden ies of the hijackers
You don't read much. That's ok. You've proven it takes you six months to click a link.
Yes, all that.the building damage, fire, melting steel and collapse that was left out of the 9/11 commission report
what are the known facts aboutYes, all that.that
your best link has been a 6 year old press release that says they are still trying to find the true inden ies of the hijackers
There is plenty. And I'm only talking about known facts. Where is the theory using the known facts? Is there even one?
Things only exist to you if they are on the internets, don't they?your best link has been a 6 year old press release that says they are still trying to find the true inden ies of the hijackers
Tell you what, file a FIOA request for all the information the FBI and CIA has on the hijakcers. I hope you have an extra room in your house.
1. what are the known facts about the building damage, fire, steel melting, and collapse?
2. your best link has been a 6 year old press release that says they are still trying to find the true inden ies of the hijackers
3. its not my fault the fbi and cia wont release the information you somehow know they have
Hey Chumpy, this guy spanks your guy McDermott
Those who prefer to believe conspiracies and don't have an adequate grasp of the sciences of materials will never be convinced of the truth.
The conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11 have been thoroughly put to rest in my opinion. The science showing it was as presumed, is on very solid ground. Structural damage and heat together made the buildings fail. All the damages are consistent with aircraft designs of the types stated.
Who cares what the hijackers ‘true’ iden ies really are. They were identified, just not to a nitpickers satisfaction.
Every time an aspect of the conspiracies surrounding this is debunked, another is subs uted.
Get a clue. People are making money off of promoting these conspiracies. They will continue to make things up as long as they are making money.
There were fires and buildings collapsed.
And you didsn't even know that existed in all your "research."2. your best link has been a 6 year old press release that says they are still trying to find the true inden ies of the hijackers
You mean it's not your fault you can't look anywhere but the internet.3. its not my fault the fbi and cia wont release the information you somehow know they have
what conspiracy?
Huh? this guy uses McDermott as a source in his blog.
You have an odd definition of spanking.
Indeed.
left out of the 9/11 commission reportThere were fires and buildings collapsed.
youre right i didnt know a 6 year old webpage that proved my point existedAnd you didsn't even know that existed in all your "research."
where should i look for the information that you say the fbi and cia have?You mean it's not your fault you can't look anywhere but the internet.
I am quite sure the collapse of the buildings is mentioned in the report.
It didn't prove your point at all. Quite the opposite.youre right i didnt know a 6 year old webpage that proved my point existed
I already told you. If this is so important to you, you will do it.where should i look for the information that you say the fbi and cia have?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
