I don't know! Maybe they would be, they had a better shot with him against Memphis that is for sure. Was it a given though? NOPE.
OKC historically struggles against Memphis and in 2011 they almost went down 3-1 against Memphis with a better team. Memphis would've still won the series IMO, the only difference is they would've probably lost Game 5 then finished them off in Game 6.
I don't know! Maybe they would be, they had a better shot with him against Memphis that is for sure. Was it a given though? NOPE.
Logic. Common sense.
You're right. 23 ppg 7 apg 5 rpg 2 spg 24 PER. That guy isn't a monumental loss.
I can only assume you are trolling because you have had so mindnumbingly stupid takes this evening.
Most of the games in the series went down to the wire, despite the Thunder only having one creator on the roster, and he was clearly gassed..
OKC wins in 6 with Westbrook, tbh..
Memphis sucks they probably lose to OKC. We probably beat OKC even with Westbrook because the dumbasses let that bearded bastage walk rather than pay him.
Now all we need is Indiana to beat Miami and I could not have scripted a better playoff scenario for le 5.
OKC lost out when they traded Harden tbh.
Anybody who said that OKC would be better without Westbrook was talking nonsense; clearly OKC was missing a huge piece. I would have backed OKC to win the series against Memphis if Westbrook have played but even so I don't think OKC would have been certain to win.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)